la dissolution des partis politiques vise à empêcher le retour au cadre constitutionnel et à permettre aux putschistes de s’éterniser au pouvoir
Summary of the Political Climate in Mali
Recent statements by geopolitical and international relations experts shed light on the troubling developments in Mali following the military coup. The junta’s decision to dissolve all political parties and appoint General Assimi Goïta as president without elections signals the establishment of a "permanent militarized authoritarianism." This move appears to be a strategy to maintain power while thwarting any return to constitutional governance.
Arslan Chikhaoui, a geopolitical expert, remarked that since the coup and the formation of the "Alliance of Sahel States" (AES), Mali has become a battleground for external powers vying for control over vital and strategic mineral resources essential for the next generation of technological advancements. The political landscape in Mali is experiencing significant upheaval, characterized by radical decisions from the so-called "transitional authorities." The dissolution of political parties effectively stifles political activity and eliminates any hope for inclusive dialogue and reconciliation—essentially entrenching a militarized authoritarian regime.
The junta justifies its continued grip on power by citing security concerns, arguing that the circumstances necessitate the consolidation of authority while simultaneously suppressing any opposing forces. Recognizing its lack of support from traditional political parties, the military junta aims to neutralize dissent by dismantling existing political structures and stifling civil society. This consolidation of power represents an absolute control mechanism over Mali’s political and economic landscape, particularly in relation to the lucrative mining sector.
Experts warn that the persistence of this "toxic political situation" will have dire ramifications, including increased regional instability and rising illegal migration. Idriss Attia, another geopolitical analyst, emphasized that the dissolution of political parties marks a severe turning point for Mali, indicating the junta’s reluctance to return to constitutional order or seek internal political legitimacy. Instead, the regime appears intent on solidifying its authority through coercive measures.
Attia further stated that the move to disband political parties signifies a bleak outlook for Mali’s political future, especially as various political movements demand a return to democratic governance. This ongoing process undermines any legitimate pathway back to political legitimacy and constitutional law.
In conclusion, the actions of Mali’s military leaders reflect a deliberate strategy to maintain power indefinitely, rejecting any aspiration for constitutional governance and deepening the crisis in the nation. Such developments not only threaten Mali but also pose challenges to the stability of the broader Sahel region.
