L’Algérie demande le rapatriement immédiat des agents français, objet d’affectation dans des conditions irrégulières
Summary of Recent Diplomatic Tensions between Algeria and France
On May 11, 2025, Algerian authorities summoned the Chargé d’affaires of the French Embassy in Algeria to address concerns regarding the irregular assignment of French agents in the country. This diplomatic meeting, held at the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, arose from Algeria’s observations of repeated violations by France in adhering to established protocols for deploying personnel at diplomatic and consular missions.
Background to the Situation
Algerian officials have noted that at least fifteen French agents have been assigned to duties without proper notification or accreditation as mandated by diplomatic procedures. These agents, who previously held service passports, were reportedly granted diplomatic passports to facilitate their entry into Algeria. Among these personnel are two agents from the French Ministry of the Interior, seemingly appointed to fill in for others who were recently declared "persona non grata" following specific diplomatic tensions.
Algeria’s diplomatic stance has been notably strict, especially given that it has experienced its own challenges with French authorities. Recent instances have included the refusal of entry into France for certain Algerian citizens possessing diplomatic passports and long delays in the accreditation of new Algerian Consuls General set to serve in Paris and Marseille—some waiting over five months.
Algeria’s Response
In light of these irregularities, the Algerian government has insisted on the immediate repatriation of the French agents assigned without following the necessary procedures. The Algerian authorities contend that these actions violate the established norms of international diplomatic practice and exacerbate existing tensions in bilateral relations between Algeria and France.
This incident reflects broader issues that have historically characterized Algerian-French relations, marked by a complex legacy stemming from colonialism. Algeria’s diplomatic assertiveness in this instance seeks not only to address immediate concerns about the presence of unauthorized foreign personnel but also underscores a desire to uphold national sovereignty and respect within international diplomatic frameworks.
Conclusion
The situation serves as a reminder of the delicacy of diplomatic relations and the importance of adhering to established protocols. Algeria’s firm response illustrates a broader trend of nations increasingly asserting their rights in matters of international diplomacy, particularly in contexts with historical grievances. As both countries navigate this incident, the implications for future diplomatic engagements and regional stability will be crucial to monitor.
